首页> 外文OA文献 >The European Arrest Warrant in the Italian legal system. Between mutual recognition and mutual fear within the European area of Freedom, Security and Justice
【2h】

The European Arrest Warrant in the Italian legal system. Between mutual recognition and mutual fear within the European area of Freedom, Security and Justice

机译:意大利法律体系中的欧洲判决保证书。在欧洲自由,安全和正义领域内的相互承认和相互恐惧之间

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Italy was the last Member State to transpose the Framework Decision on the European Arrest Warrant. The Italian law entered into full force on 14 May 2005, a full sixteen months later than the appointed date. Conversely, whilst the Framework Decision aimed to speed up extradition between Member States, the Italian implementation law seems to complicate things, providing for dozens of new legal obstacles to surrender. In fact, the execution of an EAW in Italy threatens to become something highly unpredictable. The responsibility for this outcome is shared by the national and the European legislator. Perhaps the latter underestimated the seriousness of the conflict between Third Pillar law and domestic constitutional systems which aim to protect their acquis in the field of fundamental rights. Considering that many Member States seem to be struggling with similar problems, the first part of this article is devoted to describing the current scenario and analysing possible solutions at the supranational level, such as the establishment of a coherent system regulating the allocation of penal competences among Member States. In the next part, the problem of the Framework Decision’s incompatibility with the Italian Constitution will be discussed, and in the final part the Italian implementation law is analysed in more detail.
机译:意大利是最后一个移交《欧洲逮捕令框架决定》的成员国。意大利法律于2005年5月14日生效,比指定日期晚了整整16个月。相反,虽然《框架决定》旨在加速会员国之间的引渡,但意大利实施法似乎使事情复杂化,为投降提供了许多新的法律障碍。实际上,在意大利执行EAW可能会变得非常难以预测。国家和欧洲立法者共同承担这一结果的责任。后者可能低估了第三支柱法律与旨在保护其在基本权利领域的获取的国内宪法体系之间冲突的严重性。考虑到许多会员国似乎都在为类似的问题而苦苦挣扎,因此本文的第一部分专门介绍了当前的情况并分析了超国家层面的可能解决方案,例如建立了一个统一的制度来管理刑事司法管辖权之间的刑事管辖权分配。成员国。下一部分将讨论框架决定与意大利宪法不兼容的问题,最后一部分将对意大利实施法进行更详细的分析。

著录项

  • 作者

    Impalà, Franco;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2005
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号